memcached internals question
J Ravi Menon
jravimenon at gmail.com
Wed Mar 26 18:05:10 UTC 2008
Hi.
I am new to this list, so let me know if this is not the right forum
to discuss memcached code.
We use memcached 1.2.2, but I was also looking at the latest version
1.2.5 and I see the same logic.
During item_alloc(), I don't see the 'ntotal' being
normalized to the its appropriate 'chunk size':
[Note: I might be totally missing something or reading this wrong]
size_t ntotal = item_make_header(nkey + 1, flags, nbytes, suffix, &nsuffix);
unsigned int id = slabs_clsid(ntotal);
if (id == 0)
return 0;
it = slabs_alloc(ntotal, id);
In slabs_alloc(), adjust the ptr by 'ntotal' ( size=ntotal in this function):
if (p->sl_curr != 0)
return p->slots[--p->sl_curr];
.
.
p->end_page_ptr += p->size;
Now say slab id 1 has chunk size 96, and slab id 2 has a
chunk_size=120, the id=2 is the bucket
for all item sizes from 97bytes to 120bytes.
Shouldn't it be adjusted to the maximum chunk size?
The reason I ask is that on slabs_free(), we return the item ptr back
to the slots list without any size info:
p->slots[p->sl_curr++] = ptr;
And in slabs_alloc(), it consults the slots list first for a free ptr
which could now vary in size...
Am I missing something?
Thanks,
Ravi
More information about the memcached
mailing list