some hopefully heavy mogilefs development

[komtanoo.pinpimai at livetext.com]

>The SVN trunk is already on 2.0.  It's stable, we're using it in production
>on LiveJournal.com.  Since you're starting a new project, I'd recommend
>starting with MogileFS 2.0 if you're willing to help us test it and stress
>it and look for any issues.

Hi, my company is goinging to launch MogileFS within 1 months, I have done
serveral tests with the CVS version, I also did some patches to the CVS
code to solve of large-file and memory leak issues, 'coz the company is
really paranoid of stability, they also want mysql-cluster, which looks
scary to me. Right now, I'm pretty confident with CVS code+my patches,
just want to know:

1. Which one is more stable, from SVN or CVS ?
2. Is it hard to migrate data from CVS version to SVN version in the future ?
3. Are there important bugs on the CVS code fixed in SVN ?

thanks
-kem