egor at fine.kiev.ua
Tue May 1 08:11:03 UTC 2007
On 1 may 2007, at 03:23, Eric Lambrecht wrote:
> A cursory look on the web makes me think 'smartmontools.sf.net'
> might work pretty well, as I think all our machines ultimately use
> SATA drives.
The Google team found that 36% of the failed drives did not exhibit a
single SMART-monitored failure. They concluded that SMART data is
almost useless for predicting the failure of a single drive.
Very interesting paper.
More information about the mogilefs