Comparing perlbal performance with Squid as reverse proxy with
yusufg at outblaze.com
Tue Nov 2 17:46:33 PST 2004
> Were you using epoll? (Linux 2.6)
Yes I am using epoll, Fedora Core 1 with Linux 2.6.9 (glibc is also
> We've done profiling, though, and found most (37%) of our CPU is wasted in
> the HTTPHeaders class, which isn't surprising. We tried a couple
> pure-perl versions of it, but none were faster than the original. Mark
> Smith then wrote it in C with some XS. That'll be released sometime this
> week or next, and I'd love it if you did the same benchmarks again then.
No probs, I tried the same benchmarks with current CVS and it was a bit
slower (wanted to see if web_proxy.client_persist = yes helped).
> I look forward to seeing more benchmarks from you as we start focusing on
More information about the perlbal