Virtual hosts, existing apache and some more
Ask Bjørn Hansen
ask at develooper.com
Mon Mar 14 17:04:42 PST 2005
On Mar 14, 2005, at 16:55, Harmen wrote:
> The backends do not use keepalive now, indeed. Does it differ from
> apache for the
> clients? Think the cost of a longer keepalive is almost none with
> but with Apache you need a whole child for each connection, right?
With perlbal you can keep your connections open to both the client and
to the backend without running out of them.
> Ask, have you got some Perlbal successstories to share?
I only use it for a couple of small hobby projects, but I'm very
happy with it there.
I'm planning to set it up with wackamole on search.cpan.org to load
balance and get HA between a couple of boxes.
 http://metamark.net/ (~5-600k requests a day) and
http://geourl.org/ (<~200k requests/day).
More information about the perlbal