Killing time

Carl Howells chowells at
Mon Jul 11 12:22:17 PDT 2005

Brad Fitzpatrick wrote:
> Here's a draft:
> Once I get your approval, and nobody else objects, I'll copy that to the
> real specs.bml page.

With the changes to the response to the associate mode, should 
"replace_after_s" really be the name of that field?  The field  feels 
like it needs to be treated as a hard limit, given its purpose. 
However, the name feels like a soft limit.  Would something like 
"expires_in" be a better name?


More information about the yadis mailing list