Field separators, again

[Martin Atkins]

Paul Crowley wrote:
> Martin Atkins wrote:
> 
>> * They don't like the request being URLencoded, but there's little
>> choice here since the request is described in the query string.
> 
> 
> I may have caused some confusion here.  This format is used in replies
> to get_authkey requests.  It won't have to be URL-encoded.

Sure, but we've been talking about using the same format everywhere.
Note that the complaint was that the *request* is URLencoded, not the
response. I only really picked up on that because it was an objection
raised in the article that Evan linked about LiveJournal's "flat" protocol.