Proposed Specification for New Consumer-Server Commnunications

[Paul Crowley]

Nathan D. Bowen wrote:
> Any chance that 'enc' is still negotiable?
> Since future protocols might encrypt something other than secrets, or 
> might specify some type of 'enc'oding, could we change 'enc' to anything 
> that makes sense but includes more of "mac key encrypted with=" or 
> "encryption type of mac key="?

We probably shouldn't make this specific to the MAC key.  "session_type"?
-- 
   __
\/ o\ Paul Crowley, paul at ciphergoth.org
/\__/ http://www.ciphergoth.org/