Proposed Specification for New Consumer-Server Commnunications
paul at ciphergoth.org
Fri Jun 10 01:29:03 PDT 2005
Nathan D. Bowen wrote:
> Any chance that 'enc' is still negotiable?
> Since future protocols might encrypt something other than secrets, or
> might specify some type of 'enc'oding, could we change 'enc' to anything
> that makes sense but includes more of "mac key encrypted with=" or
> "encryption type of mac key="?
We probably shouldn't make this specific to the MAC key. "session_type"?
\/ o\ Paul Crowley, paul at ciphergoth.org
More information about the yadis