Yadis Spec .9 Change Proposal: Section 7.3.1 clarify multiple
ltd at janrain.com
Thu Feb 9 16:44:37 UTC 2006
I think we should take a position. It is worthwhile to have all
implementations do the same thing when presented a document containing
multiple <XRD> elements. I believe the strategy of ignoring all <XRD>
elements except the last came from Drummond's post
If this is the correct behavior (Drummond?), then I think we need a
Johannes Ernst wrote:
> Are we certain that we want to have a position on this issue at all?
> The way your change request sounds is that different compliant
> implementations can choose data from different sections (e.g. if there
> is a higher-priority element in a non-last XRD), I don't think that is
> what we mean.
> What we have so far is unambigious, but on further reflection, maybe
> we should not take a position.
> On Feb 8, 2006, at 11:14, Larry Drebes wrote:
>> In section 7.3.1
>> The sentence
>> If a YADIS XRDS includes more than one XRD element, a Relying Party
>> Agent MUST examine at least the last XRD element.
>> should be replaced with
>> If a YADIS XRDS includes more than one XRD element, the YADIS
>> Resource Descriptor is the last XRD element. Other <XRD> elements are
> Johannes Ernst
> NetMesh Inc.
More information about the yadis