krstic at fas.harvard.edu
Thu Dec 8 16:54:41 UTC 2005
Greg Whalin wrote:
> Again though, this is unneeded and adds complexity where none is needed.
> It works fine as it is now and all clients essentially do the same
> thing. Nobody can say why this would be useful in any way.
I fully agree. The mention of patching SockIOPool in my original message
wasn't a suggestion for the actual Java client, but for the original
poster, presuming he needed a solution for the problem that low in the
stack. If he didn't, I imagine he would have figured out himself that he
can sort the array before passing it to the memcached client.
Ivan Krstic <krstic at fas.harvard.edu> | 0x147C722D
More information about the memcached