lee at anywebcam.com
Thu Dec 8 21:23:27 UTC 2005
On 09/12/2005, at 3:54 AM, Ivan Krstic wrote:
> Greg Whalin wrote:
>> Again though, this is unneeded and adds complexity where none is
>> It works fine as it is now and all clients essentially do the same
>> thing. Nobody can say why this would be useful in any way.
> I fully agree. The mention of patching SockIOPool in my original
> wasn't a suggestion for the actual Java client, but for the original
> poster, presuming he needed a solution for the problem that low in the
> stack. If he didn't, I imagine he would have figured out himself
> that he
> can sort the array before passing it to the memcached client.
> Ivan Krstic <krstic at fas.harvard.edu> | 0x147C722D
Thanks for all the responses! My question has defiantly been answered.
I wont be doing any sorting, Just added complexity that I don't think
I'll just make sure that my properties files don't go out of wack and
it should be Ok.
Connecting Real People
15 St Matthews Way
Prahran, Vic 3181
PH: +61 (3) 9525 2855
FAX: +61 (3) 9525 2055
Mobile: +61 402 221 463
Email: lee at anywebcam.com
MSN: leeekemp at hotmail.com
More information about the memcached