Server Selection

Lee Kemp lee at
Thu Dec 8 21:23:27 UTC 2005

On 09/12/2005, at 3:54 AM, Ivan Krstic wrote:

> Greg Whalin wrote:
>> Again though, this is unneeded and adds complexity where none is  
>> needed.
>> It works fine as it is now and all clients essentially do the same
>> thing.  Nobody can say why this would be useful in any way.
> I fully agree. The mention of patching SockIOPool in my original  
> message
> wasn't a suggestion for the actual Java client, but for the original
> poster, presuming he needed a solution for the problem that low in the
> stack. If he didn't, I imagine he would have figured out himself  
> that he
> can sort the array before passing it to the memcached client.
> -- 
> Ivan Krstic <krstic at> | 0x147C722D

Thanks for all the responses! My question has defiantly been answered.
I wont be doing any sorting, Just added complexity that I don't think  
is needed.
I'll just make sure that my properties files don't go out of wack and  
it should be Ok.

Lee Kemp
Connecting Real People

15 St Matthews Way
Prahran, Vic  3181

PH: +61 (3) 9525 2855
FAX: +61 (3) 9525 2055
Mobile: +61 402 221 463

Email: lee at
MSN: leeekemp at

More information about the memcached mailing list