bad for sessions?
josh at agliodbs.com
Fri Feb 11 12:04:32 PST 2005
> i.e. all the data you care about is stored somewhere else in addition to
> memcached. This is a sort of customized version of a write-through
> cache. That sounds like a good plan to me. Blindly replacing a
> database with memcached for sessions is what I think people should
No arguments here. Though I suppose there are some users who don't want
persistent session information ever ...
Aglio Database Solutions
More information about the memcached