Performance when changing the length of a keys value. (It gets
alexs at advfn.com
Sat Jul 16 13:14:16 PDT 2005
I suppose I should mention that the server is on the same machine as
the client as well.
I doubt that an increase in the number of packets (unless >10 times
more packets) is going to caused this sort of slow down. It really is
50-100 times slower than any of my normal tests show. Unless my
kernels TCP stack is just totally broken, which considering that no
other network applications behave like this on this machine from what
i've seen, I very much doubt. I will do some rough tests to see, just
in case it is producing thousands of times more packets than it
should be. I'm not even sure that packet size/count is an issue when
using the loopback interface anyway?
On 15 Jul 2005, at 18:43, Xuefer wrote:
> what if u count traffic in "packets" not in "bytes"?
More information about the memcached