Memcache::pconnect() or Memcache::connect() ?
6d6469 at gmail.com
Sun Nov 5 14:46:21 UTC 2006
I don't have any benchmarks, but I believe the amount of resources
consumed by memcached connections is negligible.
For some info on why persistent connections to MySQL are generally a
bad thing, see http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Why_persistent_connections_are_bad
On 11/5/06, howard chen <howachen at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/5/06, Michael Irwin <6d6469 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > From my experience, persistent connections to memcached are the way to
> > go, especially for a busy site.
> > On 11/5/06, howard chen <howachen at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I am using PHP extension, which one is recommended for busy site?
> > >
> > > Is persistent connection a good thing to memcached?
> > >
> I just wonder if the idle connections will eat up some memory & cpu
> time, for example, in mysql, persistent connection is not recommended
> for busy site
More information about the memcached