memcached debate

andrew at flypublishing.com andrew at flypublishing.com
Fri Apr 20 00:09:11 UTC 2007


thanks.  At what point would you say it does get unpractical?  5000
requests per second?  50,000 per second?

On 4/19/07, Ask Bjørn Hansen <ask at develooper.com> wrote:
>
> On Apr 19, 2007, at 16:29, andrew at flypublishing.com wrote:
>
> > They change all the time.  Basically I'm wondering if I can just treat
> > this huge block of memory as if it were internal memory or am I
> > kidding myself with the network issue?  thanks.
>
> 500 requests per second across 20 servers is ~nothing (in particular
> if it's say 25 processes doing 20 lookups each per second).
>
> Depending on how your application uses it and the latency
> requirements then it should be fine.
>
>
>   - ask
>
> --
> http://develooper.com/ - http://askask.com/
>
>
>


More information about the memcached mailing list