What is a valid key?
aaron at serendipity.cx
Thu Dec 20 19:23:00 UTC 2007
Looks like a space, or is actually ASCII character 32?
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007, dormando <dormando at rydia.net> said:
> Any independent byte (... octet) that looks like a space will be treated
> as a command token separator in the text protocol. In the binary
> protocol it's just a length.
> So if you have a utf8 character that's a valid non-space high byte for
> the first byte, but the second byte is a space, it'd break. I'm not even
> sure if that happens though.
> We're trying not to promote people get into situations where their keys
> will work with just one protocol or another, but we certainly can't stop
> Kieran Benton wrote:
>> No I don't think so :)
>> But it is very convenient to just have to not worry about falling foul
>> of not supported characters in keys. Its obviously an easy matter if you
>> are building a site that is for use with memcached from the start, but
>> if you are moving to memcached from another cache system (as I am) then
>> it is a bit of a worry if delimiters you have previously been using
>> might now be treated as erroneous.
>> Are we saying that as long as you use UTF-8 for the key, and that it is
>> not longer that 250 bytes, then all is fine with both text and binary
>> protocols? If so then I think we should update the docs to say so and be
>> happy :)
>> - Kieran
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: memcached-bounces at lists.danga.com
>> [mailto:memcached-bounces at lists.danga.com] On Behalf Of Dustin Sallings
>> Sent: 20 December 2007 17:58
>> To: a.
>> Cc: memcached at lists.danga.com
>> Subject: Re: What is a valid key?
>> On Dec 20, 2007, at 8:57, a. wrote:
>>> I haven't seen the server from inside (I only wrote a client), so
>>> maybe it's anoob question, but
>>> why do we have to treat the key as a "string"? Cannot be just
>>> treated as an array of bytes (whihc cannot contain some values
>>> listed earlier)? So we do not have to care about codepages and
>>> encodings and such?
>> You could do that in the server using the binary protocol, but
>> text protocol wouldn't be able to deal with it. It'd be good to
>> remain limited to the lowest common denominator.
>> I don't think anyone *really* cares about being able to use a
>> jpeg as
>> a key.
More information about the memcached