libmemcache vs libmemcached
brian at tangent.org
Fri Dec 21 23:31:55 UTC 2007
On Dec 20, 2007, at 11:48 PM, Adam Michaels wrote:
> Is your client compatible with pgmemcache and other servers that
> require the library such as lighttpd and mysql's memcached triggers?
I believe Sean is going to update pgmemecache to use it. This is his
main motivator for giving me the memory patch. I won't personally do
the pg work, but I will support anyone who does it.
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Aker" <brian at tangent.org>
> To: "Qiangning Hong" <hongqn at gmail.com>
> Cc: <memcached at lists.danga.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 6:01 PM
> Subject: Re: libmemcache vs libmemcached
>> Sean came to the most recent hackathon and we worked on adding the
>> one feature he needs so that he can use libmemcached and discard
>> libmemcache. I've not gotten the patch from him but I have pinged
>> him sense the meeting and this is still his intention.
>> The patch deals with using alternative memory allocators, its a
>> good addition.
>> If in your testing you fine something that libmemcached is missing,
>> I would love to hear about it.
>> On Dec 19, 2007, at 10:10 PM, Qiangning Hong wrote:
>>> has anyone compared the two C client library: libmemcache
>>> <http://people.freebsd.org/~seanc/libmemcache/> and libmemcached
>>> <http://tangent.org/552/libmemcached.html>? What are the pros and
>>> cons for each of them?
>>> Qiangning Hong
>> Brian "Krow" Aker, brian at tangent.org
>> Seattle, Washington
>> http://krow.net/ <-- Me
>> http://tangent.org/ <-- Software
>> http://exploitseattle.com/ <-- Fun
>> You can't grep a dead tree.
Brian "Krow" Aker, brian at tangent.org
http://krow.net/ <-- Me
http://tangent.org/ <-- Software
http://exploitseattle.com/ <-- Fun
You can't grep a dead tree.
More information about the memcached