[PATCH 2/3] Use callback functions to process commands.

[Aaron Stone]

On Fri, Nov 9, 2007, Tomash Brechko <tomash.brechko at gmail.com> said:

> On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 09:37:47 -0800, Marc wrote:
>> Sorry I didn�t reply to this sooner.  It wound up in my junk folder.
>> 
>> What is the ultimate goal of all these changes?  The switch wasn�t that
>> huge, nor do I think a bunch of callbacks is particularly cleaner or more
>> readable - especially when you start throwing macros into the mix.
> 
> I think we already abandoned the idea of using GPerf and callbacks
> altogether.

That's a shame. I rather like at least the use of gperf.

>> I don�t mind taking cleanup changes that are included with feature
>> and, more importantly, performance and scalability enhancements.

To Marc: how is only accepting cleanups with new features good practice?

Aaron