'noreply' over the wire

Steven Grimm sgrimm at facebook.com
Sun Nov 11 18:43:47 UTC 2007

On Nov 11, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Iain Wade wrote:
> I haven't read the patches so can't comment on them, but sure, I do
> some bulk updates (500k every 5 min) using a dodgy bit of code that
> would benefit from a noreply feature.

For that use case, which would you prefer?

1. A noreply option on a per-command basis (the proposed change)
2. A single command to suppress all replies and another command to  
turn them on again (e.g., "silent on" and "silent off" commands)

It seems like #2 would be better suited to that use case since, if I  
understand you correctly, you're throwing away replies in bulk at the  
moment. Or do you want to mix ignoring replies and paying attention to  


More information about the memcached mailing list