CAS is broken
dustin at spy.net
Sun Nov 11 20:15:02 UTC 2007
On Nov 11, 2007, at 9:39, Tomash Brechko wrote:
> However internally (and this was mentioned in the thread) CAS value is
> actually a pointer (cast to uint32_t for some reason). So I thought,
> how we know the pointer won't be reused?
The pointers are definitely reused. I found that in my testing a
while back, but I thought we had fixed it by having a separate
sequence for generating CAS identifiers.
More information about the memcached