Extensible command syntax
tomash.brechko at gmail.com
Tue Nov 13 17:54:21 UTC 2007
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:44:40 -0800, Dustin Sallings wrote:
> If I ask for [a, b, c, d], and I get back [c, d], then at the point
> where I got c, I know I'm not going to get a or b. My client doesn't
> currently optimize for that case, but it certainly could if it
> mattered. If I designed for an array of pairs, I could just as easily
> do the same thing.
You can do that _comparing_ the keys or key ids, while I propose only
counting the results. Or is it an indirect arguing again? ;)
> You'd be free to use get and get explicit NAKs if you wanted to,
But I will use TCP_CORK advantage of getq then. You simply refusing
to see the point.
More information about the memcached