Extensible command syntax

[Tomash Brechko]

On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:44:40 -0800, Dustin Sallings wrote:
> 	If I ask for [a, b, c, d], and I get back [c, d], then at the point  
> where I got c, I know I'm not going to get a or b.  My client doesn't  
> currently optimize for that case, but it certainly could if it  
> mattered.  If I designed for an array of pairs, I could just as easily  
> do the same thing.

You can do that _comparing_ the keys or key ids, while I propose only
counting the results.  Or is it an indirect arguing again? ;)


> You'd be free to use get and get explicit NAKs if you wanted to,
> though.

But I will use TCP_CORK advantage of getq then.  You simply refusing
to see the point.


-- 
   Tomash Brechko