Proposal: lets get rid of the non-thread code
Roy.Lyseng at Sun.COM
Thu Feb 7 22:12:42 UTC 2008
do we have some relative performance numbers between threaded and
non-threaded code (Latnecy + CPU consumption)?
Trond Norbye wrote:
> On Feb 7, 2008, at 9:00 PM, Brian Moon wrote:
>> Brian Aker wrote:
>>> 1) No one buys single processors machines today.
>>> 2) Memcached should be as simple to install as possible.
>>> 3) Less code to maintain means less... well work.
>>> 4) Single points of execution makes code less buggy and easier to
>>> So lets pull the non-thread code out of memcached and default to just
>>> the threaded version.
> When do we start? ;-)
More information about the memcached