memcache as database
Brian Aker
brian at tangent.org
Thu Jun 12 12:37:29 UTC 2008
Hi!
On Jun 12, 2008, at 5:08 AM, Henrik Schröder wrote:
> ...and you can not load these rows directly into your application,
> do the manipulation, and then store the results in another db table
> because...? I'm totally not seeing what use you have for an external
> cache like memcached in this case, where you only load the data from
> the database once. Or am I missing something?
It looks like just using a plain old memory table would be faster. The
only reason I could think of to use memcached for this would be if the
data set was so large that using a distributed table made sense (aka
get more memory from aggregating multiple machines).
But for ip's.... that would have to be more then what this person has.
Cheers,
-Brian
--
_______________________________________________________
Brian "Krow" Aker, brian at tangent.org
Seattle, Washington
http://krow.net/ <-- Me
http://tangent.org/ <-- Software
_______________________________________________________
You can't grep a dead tree.
More information about the memcached
mailing list