Allocation Memory to memcached 1.2.1 for Win32
Tinkku J.P
tinkku at gmail.com
Wed Mar 5 21:37:45 UTC 2008
Hi Tormod,
Could you please tell the parameter name in the Registry settings for
memory and ports.It would be very helpful. I am not finding any
parameter name, that goes with memory and ports.
Regards,
Tinkku.
On 3/3/08, Tormod Hystad <thy at komplett.com> wrote:
> When I set up new Win32 memcached instances I install them as a service
> using the "-d install" switch. Then stop the service and edit the
> registry settings (HKLM/System/CurrentControlSet/Services/Memcached) for
> that service to change the parameters (memory, ip, ports and so on) and
> then start the service again. Works great.
>
> Slightly on-topic: Any news of a more updated Win32 build publicly
> available? I saw some messages about someone having a go at building
> 1.2.4 + libevent 1.4 for Win32 around Christmas, haven't seen anything
> since.
>
> One of the devs here spent some hours the other night and built
> memcached 1.2.4 with libevent 1.3e for Win32. Any known problems with
> that setup? We're deploying it to our test environment tomorrow and if
> it works out OK we'll deloy it to production at the end of the week. I
> guess we could make the binaries available to the public, if there is
> interest.
>
>
> - Tormod,
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: memcached-bounces at lists.danga.com [mailto:memcached-
> > bounces at lists.danga.com] On Behalf Of Tinkku J.P
> > Sent: 29. februar 2008 18:32
> > To: Jehiah Czebotar
> > Cc: memcached at lists.danga.com
> > Subject: Re: Allocation Memory to memcached 1.2.1 for Win32
> >
> > jehiah
> > As you concluded, it seems only default memory is getting allocated,
> > bcoz when i trying storing beyond certain limit(nearly 11000) , it
> > clears of the old record for storing the new one.
> > Could you also please advice on any installation procedures for
> > "memcached for Windows" that need to be taken care for fixing this.
> >
> > Tinkku
> >
> > On 2/29/08, Jehiah Czebotar <jehiah at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > it might be helpful for you to describe if
> > >
> > > a) you are describing that it starts with only 64mb of memory
> > >
> > > or
> > >
> > > b) it never grows beyond 64mb even when the cache is filled.
> > >
> > > the former might be correct, the later would probably not.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jehiah
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Tinkku J.P <tinkku at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > Hi ,
> > > > I installed the memcached 1.2.1 for Win32 on my Windows XP
> machine.
> > > >
> > > > But it seems it is taking default memory space of 64MB for
> storage.I
> > > > tried uninstalling and installing back by allocating more space
> to
> > > > memcache, But still it takes the default memory space. I tried
> > > > installing nearly 20 times. I got it right once, having allocated
> > more
> > > > memory. But again i tried uninstalling and installing, i am not
> > > > getting it right.
> > > > Could you please advice on how to allocate memory to memcache and
> > > > whether there are any new memcache intallable for Windows, than
> > > > memcached 1.2.1 for Win32?
> > > >
> > > > Tinkku
> > > >
> > >
>
More information about the memcached
mailing list