Client interoperability, server selection.

[Brian Aker]

Hi!

On Mar 9, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Tomash Brechko wrote:

> It's not like I experience problems implementing the algorithm as it
> is, I mentioned shared memory just to clarify why one might hesitate
> linking with libketama blindly.  But I don't want the clients to have
> "compatible ketama or fast ketama---choose any" "flexibility" in them

To me ketama is just another distribution type, one that can be  
selected by the end user or not.

I think it is good to have a few "do this, it works across all  
libraries", but at the same time I do not want to go to a least common  
denominator solution.

Flexibility is good :)

Cheers,
	-Brian

--
_______________________________________________________
Brian "Krow" Aker, brian at tangent.org
Seattle, Washington
http://krow.net/                     <-- Me
http://tangent.org/                <-- Software
_______________________________________________________
You can't grep a dead tree.