Re: 答复: Tag Function

[Du Song]

like the author has noted, that patch is currently for memcached 1.2.4 only.
there're lots of diff between 1.2.4 and thunk(e.g. binary_protocol) i think.

2008/3/20 André Cruz <andre.cruz at co.sapo.pt>:
>
> Hello.
>
> It looks like the patch was never applied to the main trunk.
> Is it unstable? What work remains to be done?
>
> Best regards,
> André Cruz
>
>
>
> On 2008/02/13, at 07:40, Robert Q. Liu wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
> I agree with your opinions!
> We test the "tag-function" for a long time, and there are two patch files on
> the web site (one for memcached, one for module).
> Can you merge they into the main project, please?
>
> Robert Q. Liu
>
> ________________________________
>
> 发件人: Chris Goffinet [mailto:goffinet at yahoo-inc.com]
> 发送时间: 2008年2月13日 11:40
> 收件人: Dustin Sallings
> 抄送: Robert Q. Liu; <memcached at lists.danga.com>
> 主题: Re: Tag Function
>
> Dustin:
>
> Thought the same thing. Was a bit off. At least there is a diff on the site
> :)
>
>
>
> --
> Chris Goffinet
> MyBlogLog Engineer
> Yahoo!
> San Francisco, CA
> United States
>
>
> On Feb 12, 2008, at 7:34 PM, Dustin Sallings wrote:
>
>
>
>
>   I'm sure we all appreciate the effort, but I don't think it was necessary
> to create a formal fork of the project to do so.
>
>   Is there something about your implementation that you feel makes it
> unsuitable to be merged into the main project?
>
> --
> Dustin Sallings (mobile)
>
> On Feb 12, 2008, at 19:15, "Robert Q. Liu" <robertqingliu at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, all:
>
>     We add "Tag Function" for memcached. Propose is remove several keys with
> the same tag in one operation. We use hash and splay tree, make the
> "tag_add" and "tag_delete" commands very quickly, and save memory as much as
> possible.
>
> New memcached command:
> tag_add <tag> <key>*
> tag_delete <tag>
>
>     More detail:
>         http://code.google.com/p/memcached-tag/
>
>     If you find BUGS, please tell us, thanks very much.
>
> Have Fun!
> Robert Q. Liu
>
>
>



-- 
Regards,
Du Song