Proxy server caching

Ask Bjørn Hansen ask at
Mon Mar 31 04:27:09 UTC 2008

On Mar 30, 2008, at 5:48 PM, drpr0ctologist at wrote:

> 2) Which would be better, Squid or Perlbal (as caching proxy)? If I  
> decide to use Perlbal, would I have to install another copy of it,  
> on another server?  The current one isn't a caching server but a  
> "reverse_proxy" server.

perlbal doesn't currently cache content (although I guess you could  
make it).  It can be setup to cache the mogile paths though.

I'd recommend looking at Varnish to cache the content.

  - ask

-- -

More information about the perlbal mailing list