Proxy server caching
Ask Bjørn Hansen
ask at develooper.com
Mon Mar 31 04:27:09 UTC 2008
On Mar 30, 2008, at 5:48 PM, drpr0ctologist at gmail.com wrote:
> 2) Which would be better, Squid or Perlbal (as caching proxy)? If I
> decide to use Perlbal, would I have to install another copy of it,
> on another server? The current one isn't a caching server but a
> "reverse_proxy" server.
perlbal doesn't currently cache content (although I guess you could
make it). It can be setup to cache the mogile paths though.
I'd recommend looking at Varnish to cache the content.
http://develooper.com/ - http://askask.com/
More information about the perlbal