Folks: Notice the change made back at Yadis Specification draft
0.7
David Recordon
david at sixapart.com
Tue Apr 4 23:31:30 UTC 2006
This is either a bug in the spec or in the implementations. Only one of
X-YADIS-Location and X-XRDS-Location should be used, both should not be
included as part of the spec. I believe the spec should refer to
X-YADIS-Location and that is the one that should be used.
--David
________________________________
From: yadis-bounces at lists.danga.com
[mailto:yadis-bounces at lists.danga.com] On Behalf Of Joaquin Miller
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 2:46 PM
To: Yadis list
Subject: Folks: Notice the change made back at Yadis Specification draft
0.7
Implementors:
Here is a message from one of your fellow implementors. They were
having successful tests (that is: things weren't working).
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 09:28:25 -0700
To: "Johannes Ernst" <jernst at netmesh.us>
Cc: ... Joaquin Miller <joaquin at netmesh.us>
Johannes:
Quick update. The spec says to have a header with X-XRDS-Location but
all of the implementations look for X-YADIS-Location.
Once we made the change all is working.
Gary
So remember, folks: It is courteous to look for X-YADIS-Location, but,
as we like to write using all caps:
Implementations MUST look for X-XRDS-Location.
Cordially, Joaquin
(p.s. The Caps Cops remind us: You can even look for X-Yadis-Location,
if you want.)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.danga.com/pipermail/yadis/attachments/20060404/dc8ca5b3/attachment.htm
More information about the yadis
mailing list