Folks: Notice the change made back at Yadis Specification draft 0.7

David Recordon david at sixapart.com
Tue Apr 4 23:31:30 UTC 2006


This is either a bug in the spec or in the implementations.  Only one of
X-YADIS-Location and X-XRDS-Location should be used, both should not be
included as part of the spec.  I believe the spec should refer to
X-YADIS-Location and that is the one that should be used.

 

--David

 

________________________________

From: yadis-bounces at lists.danga.com
[mailto:yadis-bounces at lists.danga.com] On Behalf Of Joaquin Miller
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 2:46 PM
To: Yadis list
Subject: Folks: Notice the change made back at Yadis Specification draft
0.7

 


Implementors:

Here is a message from one of your fellow implementors.  They were
having successful tests (that is: things weren't working).




Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 09:28:25 -0700
To: "Johannes Ernst" <jernst at netmesh.us>
Cc: ... Joaquin Miller <joaquin at netmesh.us>

Johannes:

Quick update. The spec says to have a header with X-XRDS-Location but
all of the implementations look for X-YADIS-Location.

Once we made the change all is working.

Gary


So remember, folks:  It is courteous to look for X-YADIS-Location, but,
as we like to write using all caps:

       Implementations MUST look for X-XRDS-Location.

Cordially, Joaquin


(p.s. The Caps Cops remind us: You can even look for X-Yadis-Location,
if you want.)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.danga.com/pipermail/yadis/attachments/20060404/dc8ca5b3/attachment.htm


More information about the yadis mailing list