tomash.brechko at gmail.com
Mon Nov 12 16:06:22 UTC 2007
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 09:55:17 -0600, Brian Moon wrote:
> I disagree. I don't see anything here that is not a Perl client tweak.
> 200ms for 100k sets is not a significant increase for me. And since
> it requires a perl client trick of knowing if you are returning a value
> or not it does not seem that portable to other clients. Not sure how
> you do that in the PHP, Python, C etc.
Add 'noreply' as the last argument to add, set, replace, prepend,
append, cas, and see for yourself if it's only a Perl tweak ;).
More information about the memcached