binary protocol motivations

[Josef Finsel]

Ah... My mistake.

On Nov 13, 2007 8:32 AM, Tomash Brechko <tomash.brechko at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 08:05:18 -0500, Josef Finsel wrote:
> > I voted for tags so I could quickly invalidate portions of the cache.
> Rather
> > than have to track all of the keys associated with my *foo *data, I
> could
> > tag each key with the foo tag and then do a *tagdelete foo* or something
> > similar and memcached would simple do a delete of the keys that match
> that
> > value.
>
> Got that, that would be useful.  But that would be another use of
> tags, not the same as described in binary protocol paper, where tags
> are opaque and simply copied from request to reply.  Those tags are
> solely to save on sending back key names, or so I understood it.
>
>
> --
>   Tomash Brechko
>



-- 
"If you see a whole thing - it seems that it's always beautiful. Planets,
lives... But up close a world's all dirt and rocks. And day to day, life's a
hard job, you get tired, you lose the pattern."
Ursula K. Le Guin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.danga.com/pipermail/memcached/attachments/20071113/7d151b2d/attachment.htm